Report: Heat Interested in Knicks' Eddy Curry
The New York Daily News files this nugget:
Eddy Curry met briefly with his agent, Leon Rose, before last night's game. Curry has been sidelined since the second game of the season with a bruised right knee. He is expected to be out another two weeks.
D'Antoni had removed Curry from the rotation before the Knick season opener.
There is interest in the center from the Spurs and Heat. Miami may be willing to trade D'Antoni favorite Shawn Marion, but a potential deal with Curry is complicated because their salaries don't match.
I'd do Marion for Curry and Quentin Richardson, or for Curry and Malik Rose. I'd really like to get Nate Robinson or David Lee involved, but that seems a little much.
Curry would fit in nicely at center next to natural power forward Udonis Haslem and Michael Beasley, who is starting to look more and more like a small forward with an advanced post game. There's obviously a lot to be concerned about with Curry, but he's a good post scorer and a wide body. Haslem and Beasley can help on the boards. It would be nice if Curry would step up his defense from non-existent to mediocre. Curry would also do well to drop a few pounds before Pat Riley sees him without his shirt on.
Curry's arrival and Marion's exit would end the necessary but unsustainable three-forward lineup the Heat currently fields. It could also help Miami stop donning the disguise of a running team and get back to the old smash-mouth brand of Heat basketball.
Plus, Curry's contract expires in the summer of 2010, so there's not a huge downside. Here are the scenarios, as I see them:
- Curry turns into an All-Star center, forming a deadly trio with Wade and Beasley. Miami uses free agency to fill needs rather than pursue a major target like Chris Bosh.
- Curry fills the need without turning into a star, and the Heat locks him up in a reasonable contract while still re-signing Dwyane Wade and bringing in a high-end free agent.
- Curry totally flames out and falls out of the rotation. The Heat is left with its current roster, save for shooters Daequan Cook and James Jones splitting time at small forward in Marion's place, and allows Curry's contract to expire in time for a major push in 2010 free agency.
Hard to see a downside to this deal, if you share my opinion that Marion will never have a clear, productive role with the Heat. And I don't think New York can do better for Curry than a contract-seeking Marion, an All-Star in the system Mike D'Antoni is instituting.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
right on
Marion and Beasley might figure out how to mesh on a team that has a center – but Miami has no center. And Marion’s on the down side of his career – Beasley is the one you need to hang on to.
As a Blazer fan, I too covet Nate Robinson, but not for long if Sergio continues to play well. Nate would be great for Miami – and so might Sergio.
If I was D-Wade, I’d be so P.O.’d at Riley. – Elgin.
All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James
NYK-Miami Trade Proposal
Marbury + Curry = Marion + Blount. The salaries are close enough to make the trade work.
That would work too for Miami
Or it should.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
But I think the only way Miami would do that
If is Malik Rose was included.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
sorry
Curry has a Player Option for 2010.
I still wouldn’t worry about 2010 if I were the Heat, and instead try to get good so Wade stays. Not that Eddy Curry helps that either…
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 13, 2008 3:18 PM EST reply actions
First of all, Matt is right that Curry has player options in 2010 and 2011.
Second, he is one of the worst centers in the NBA in virtually every category outside of post scoring (and even that attribute is negated by the fact that he’s one of the worst passing bigs in the league).
He’s shown no signs of turning the other aspects of his game around, so I wouldn’t trade for him expecting that to change now.
So what we’re discussing here is eliminating our chance at landing a big time free agent in 2010 for an out of shape, unmotivated post scorer who sucks at everything else.
There’s no way that I’d do that.
The Heat should only blow up their 2010 cap space for a player who’s a long term answer at PG or center.
You don't want Eddie Curry and Malik Rose
Rather keep the cap space and let Marion go somewhere else next off-season.
Blog Site
Hey guys, I’m working on establishing a steady blog site over at blogspot in order to become a blogger for SB Nation soon. In any case, I would appreciate your support if you head over to zagssports.blogspot.com and sign up. I will have several updates daily on all miami sports.
I opened it today, so im working on getting it going with up to date analysis, etc. If you guys head over, feel free to comment on the threads, etc..
Thank you for your support!
Here's an adjusted idea for Miami/NY
The Knicks get Marion, Blount and Banks. The Heat get Curry, Marbury and Rose.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
I suppose you could substitute Rose for
Jared Jeffries if you think Donnie Walsh will be super ass stingy in doing a deal. (No reason not to think that the way Donnie has acted so far.)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
What do we want with the Knicks’s trash? Curry is terrible and ruins our capspace. Marbury is a cancer- look at how well NY is playing without those two.
Marion is essential to our defense and rebounding and he plays hard and unselfishly even if he is lost as a 3 in our offense. He will probably be traded but not for those Knick guys.

by 











